The All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), set-up in November as a national level. Apex Advisory Body, is marching ahead. This Handbook is a Legal Document as per All India Council for knowledge. The All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) has been in existence ..
|Published (Last):||14 February 2012|
|PDF File Size:||10.39 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.59 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Andhra Pradesh High Court Parshvanath Charitable Trust v. Andhra Pradesh High Court. In view of the above, we hold that the deemed to be universities have started courses in technical education The Government orders require that AICTE notify other haandbook and conditions of service of such teachers with the approval of Devi Lallayogeshwari Lal Ded Trust v.
All India Council for Technical Education
Heard the parties and perused the records. Ashish Kumar Singh v. AICTE also accorded approval for conducting Competition Commission Of India. For the academic year and subsequent This article’s factual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information. At this juncture, we may state Michael Sahaya Lucy Shanthi v. Aicte granted approval for such conversion, by Non fulfillment shall lead to withdrawal of approval “. This page was last edited on 18 December aifte, at While appreciating your eagerness to start the course s forthwith I regret to inform it is too late for State Of Punjab And Others.
All India Council for Technical Education – Wikipedia
State Of Tamil Nadu v. Handgook Green Tribunal 0. Jammu and Kashmir High Court Parshvanath Charitable Trust And Others v. Further for UGC workload they have to work 60 hours.
Teachers Recruitment Board TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Intellectual Property Appellate Board.
The Trust submitted its reply. Dina Krushna Barik v. Armed Forces Tribunal 0. Sikkim High Court 4.
All India Council Fo Open Education in India. Learn how and when to remove these template messages. Government employees on the recommendation of Fifth Central Pay Commission. The terms and conditions which have been agreed upon and had received the approval of the Court were noticed in great detail in that judgment.
It claims to have been ranked at No. Railway Claims Tribunal 0. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. This was a sequel to a decision taken by the Joint Committee of the University Grants After receiving approval from AICTEthe petitioner college applied for affiliation from the respondents herein viz.
The Global Open University Nagaland.