DoD R, “Department o£ Defense Personnel Security Program,” December , is hereby canceled as of December 31, DoD M – National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual. ( NISPOM) DoD R – Personnel Security Program. DOD R: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PERSONNEL SECURITY PROGRAM.
|Published (Last):||11 February 2014|
|PDF File Size:||20.6 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.58 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
No adverse inference concerning the standards in this guideline may be made solely on the basis of the sexual orientation of the individual. As it becomes easier for people to access computer databases, ease of use means ease of abuse.
By its very nature, past or current criminal activity calls into question a person’s ability or willingness to comply with laws, rules and regulations. In evaluating the relevance of an individual’s conduct, the adjudicator will consider the 13 Adjudicative Guidelines and cross reference them with the following below-listed 9 Adjudicative Factors:.
Affluence that cannot be explained by known sources of income is also a security concern. It may indicate proceeds from financially profitable criminal acts. Respectfully, Bill Meili Dallas Office: If adverse information comes from a single source, it is necessary to evaluate both the credibility cod the source’s access to that information and any possible ulterior motives for providing that information. The nature, extent, and cod of the conduct.
Foreign Preference If an applicant’s behavior indicates a preference for a foreign country over the United States, then the applicant may be prone to providing information or making decisions that are harmful to U.
The work environment that tacitly ignores or tolerates petty violations is also the climate where serious violations are most likely to occur. Compulsive gambling is a concern as it may lead to financial crimes including espionage.
DOD 5200.2-R PDF
Any deliberate violation of security rules or regulations, including Handling Protected Information during previous employment in the private sector, is a significant concern, as it may indicate indifference toward national security or a general inability or unwillingness to abide by the security regulations.
The potential for pressure, coercion, exploitation, or duress.
Most, if not all, of these topics or issues can be mitigated and be made to appear less severe. Adjudications Certain positions within DoD entail duties of such a sensitive nature, including access to classified information, that the misconduct, malfeasance or nonfeasance of an incumbent in any such position could result in an unacceptably adverse impact upon the national security of the United States.
Your current or future job is at stake. It indicates that the employee-employer relationship, too, is likely to withstand the inevitable rocky periods that crop up in most relationships and which might otherwise cause the employee to turn against the employer. Conduct involving questionable judgment, lack of candor, dishonesty or unwillingness to comply with regulations can raise questions about an applicant’s reliability, trustworthiness and ability to protect classified national security information CNSI.
Emotionally stable and well-adjusted individuals generally respond to these experiences in positive ways; by learning from them, adjusting their expectations, working harder or sticking with their core values.
The ultimate determination of whether the granting or continuing of eligibility for a security clearance is clearly consistent with the interests of national security must be an overall common sense judgment based upon careful consideration of the 13 adjudicative guidelines, each of which is to be evaluated in the context of the whole person.
DoD R, “Personnel Security Program,” 1/
Noncompliance with rules, procedures, guidelines or regulations pertaining to information technology systems may raise security concerns about an individual’s reliability and trustworthiness, calling into question the willingness or ability to properly protect sensitive systems, networks and information.
It is principally a Foreign Influence or Foreign Preference issue when an individual shows a preference for a foreign country, serves a foreign interest or is vulnerable to foreign influence that puts protected information at risk. Social Responsibility Maintaining security requires following the rules for protection of classified information.
Certain positions within DoD entail duties of such a sensitive nature, including access to classified information, that the misconduct, malfeasance or nonfeasance of an incumbent in any such position could result in an unacceptably adverse impact upon the national security of the United States.
Notwithstanding the whole-person concept, pursuit of further investigation may be terminated by an appropriate adjudicative agency in the face of reliable, significant, disqualifying, adverse information. Any doubt concerning personnel being considered for access to classified information will be resolved in favor of the national security.
Know which questions will not be asked. Most of all, know the appropriate responses to the topic or issue questions.
rod Government as a drug-free workplace. Unfavorable information is more useful when time and frequency are expressed in specific rather than general terms: This includes protecting controlled but unclassified information such as For Official Use Only FOUOproprietary, export-controlled or privacy information.
The following adjudicative guidelines are established for all U. An applicant must be of unquestioned allegiance to the United States. Records are electronically deleted from the database.
DOD Adjudicative Elements – Security Clearance
By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. Outside Activities Involvement in certain types of outside employment or activities is of security concern if it poses a conflict of interest with an individual’s security responsibilities and could create an increased risk of unauthorized disclosure of classified information.
Deliberate or negligent failure to comply with rules and regulations for protecting classified or other sensitive information raises doubt about an individual’s trustworthiness, judgment, reliability or willingness and ability to safeguard such information and is a serious security concern.
Of particular concern are three types of role conflict: If allegiance to the United States is in doubt, an individual’s willingness to safeguard classified information is also in doubt. The use of illegal drugs or the misuse of prescription drugs can raise questions about an applicant’s reliability and trustworthiness since these actions impair judgment and suggest an inability or unwillingness to comply with laws, rules and regulations.